Lost in translation? pediatric preventive care and language barriers.

J Pediatr. 2006 Feb;148(2):254-258.
Primary language of parent is associated with disparities in pediatric preventive care.Cohen AL, Christakis DA.
Department of Pediatrics, Child Health Institute, and Children's Hospital andRegional Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether infants of parents whose primary language is not English are less likely to receive recommended preventive care than infant sof parents whose primary language is English.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all 38,793 1-year-old Medicaid-enrolled infants born in Washington state between January 1, 1999 and September 30, 2000. The main exposure was self-reported primary language of parents. Using multivariate regression, we estimated the relative risk of receiving appropriate and timely receipt of preventive care visits in the first year as recommended by theAmerican Academy of Pediatrics and Washington state Medicaid.
RESULTS: Fewerthan 1 in 6 (15.4%) infants received all 6 recommended preventive care visits in their first year of life. Infants of parents whose primary language was not English were half as likely to receive all recommended preventive care visits compared with infants of parents whose primary language was English (adjusted relative risk = 0.53; 95% confidence interval = 0.49 to 0.58). This disparity was seen in white, Hispanic, and African-American infants, but not in Asian-American infants.
CONCLUSIONS: Disparities based on primary language existin receipt of recommended pediatric preventive care in white, Hispanic, and African-American infants enrolled in Medicaid.